![]() ![]() The words “cheap” and “routine” were the words which most closely matched the objectives for Space Shuttles as expressed by NASA. In addition, NASA believed that Space Shuttles could serve as multi-purpose satellite delivery vehicles with the potential to completely replace Atlas-Centaur, Delta and Titan rockets. #Nasa space shuttle photo plusThe space station would support a plethora of scientific research objectives, plus act as an engineering and support base for manned journeys to the planets. presence in space following the Apollo lunar landings. The space station was intended to assure a permanent manned U.S. At the time, NASA envisioned a space station which would be staffed by 12 to 24 people. The first goal of the Space Shuttle program was to provide NASA with an efficient, re-usable method of carrying astronauts to and from a permanently manned space station. Space Shuttle Artist Conception, Photo Courtesy NASAīorn in 1968 at the height of the Apollo program, the Space Shuttle was designed to fulfill two basic roles in NASA post-Apollo manned flight objectives. ![]() In fact, I demand it! NASA, I await your call.By Cliff Lethbridge SPACE SHUTTLE PROGRAM HISTORY ![]() I'll give them, say, eight more flights, but then I want the Shuttle Transport System shut down for once and for all. Now, realistically, they cannot simply turn off the whole program. We cannot let this type of trickery stand. I am demanding NASA shut down the Shuttle program. And this one is CLEARLY faked! My course of action is clear. Not a word as to WHY NASA WOULD HAVE FAKED THIS IMAGE! Our tax dollars paid for this picture! Hundreds of billions of dollars of American citizens' money has been sent to NASA, and really what do we have to show for it? NASA's promises, and a bunch of pictures. During STS-101 Atlantis will fly as the most updated shuttle ever, with more than 100 new modifications incorporated during a ten-month period in 1998 at Boeing's Palmdale, Ca., Shuttle factory. The new cockpit is expected to be installed on all shuttles in the NASA fleet by 2002, and it sets the stage for the next cockpit improvement planned to fly by 2005: a "smart cockpit" that reduces the pilot's workload during critical periods. The new "glass cockpit" is 75 pounds lighter and uses less power than before, and its color displays provide easier pilot recognition of key functions. JSC2000-E-10522 (March 2000) - Eleven new full-color, flat-panel display screens in the Shuttle cockpit replace 32 gauges and electromechanical displays and four cathode-ray tube displays. but here is the complete caption on the NASA page for this image. It would give some innocent reason why NASA would add stars to a photograph. ![]() A paradigm shift this big could rate a NOBEL! Maybe this was just a mistake, and the caption of the picture would say something about it. If I was really breaking new ground here like Galileo or Einstein did, then I had to be careful. Was this mission faked in some way? Was the whole Shuttle project faked? Does NASA even exist?Īt this point, I wondered if maybe I was making too much of this. There's only one explanation: Someone at NASA faked the photo!!! They added in stars later, for what nefarious purposes only the Top Brass at NASA must know. Even the Moon would look dull and dim if the Earth were exposed correctly. The Earth is THOUSANDS of times brighter than the stars. Third, and worst, the Earth hangs fat and bright right smack dab in the center of the viewports! The bright Earth could not possibly be exposed correctly and have the photo still show stars in the windows. Why? Because otherwise the reflections block the view. Whenever you see astronauts taking pictures out the windows, they are always RIGHT UP next to the windows, not a few feet away. Second, those interior lights would reflect inside those windows, again drowning out any outside sources. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |